Roger Clemens jurors were interviewed by Associated Press and New York Daily News

Names of twelve persons (four men and eight women) that composed jury at the governmental case against Roger Clemens were released by the judge Reggie Walton.
The government desired the jury to be convinced that the athlete had lied before the Congress about application of steroids and HGH. But since the jury acquitted Roger Clemens, the government criticized the individuals who served as the jury. Several persons who acted as the jury were interviewed.
A political activist, an art historian, a teacher of deaf children, an official of Treasury Department and an employee of the Canadian Embassy were included in the jury.
Joyce Robinson-Paul, a political activist, was interviewed by the New York Daily News certain days after the verdict. She noted that the jurors comprehended that they had to be fair to both the federal prosecutors and the athlete. But they didn’t find anything that had to be prosecuted.  Later she also noted that the federal prosecutor couldn’t prove their affirmations.
Bradford Weaver, an employee of the Canadian Embassy confirmed that the government was wrong. He noticed that such cases should not be repeated. He also claimed that there was nothing to be pursued. This person was interviewed by the Associated Press. He also affirmed that every juror knew from the very beginning that Clemens was not proven guilty of any charge. This person reminded that each juror was unanimous.
Bradford Weaver was also asked whether he considered that Roger Clemens really administered steroids. The Associated Press also asked him whether he considered that the governmental case against Roger Clemens represented only the waste of taxpayers’ funds. But Bradford Weaver didn’t answer the questions.
Another juror that chose not to be named confirmed that the jurors didn’t understand how the government could spend essential sums of money during five years in order to pursue the baseball player. This person noted that it was impossible to comprehend why the prosecution took place 5 years.
Other jurors didn’t provide any information.
As for federal prosecutors, they seemed to be wholly disappointed. They refused to respond to the affirmations presented by the jurors.