Lance Armstrong’s doping scandal made him more prominent

The Dallas Morning News is a daily newspaper which is very popular in the USA. Certain persons whose deeds have great impact on the society are chosen each year for the “Texan of the Year” award. It is necessary to know that not just positive deeds are taken in consideration. Even deeds that have been influenced on the society negatively may promote receiving the “Texan of the Year” award. So, Lance Armstrong’s doping scandal made the cyclist the finalist for the “Texan of the Year” award.
As you understand, Lance Armstrong’s doping case is not pleasant. Although this scandal disgraced the celebrated American cyclist, it made him more prominent. The doping case had significant impact on the society. A lot of individuals discussed the situation related to his usage of anabolic steroids, EPO and other related medicines. Many individuals focused on the following questions: “Have Lance Armstrong really used doping products?”, Why has he lied?”, Which products have been administered by him?”, How could he avoid detection?”, etc.
The Dallas Morning News didn’t fail to describe positive actions of Lance Armstrong as well. The newspaper noticed about efforts of the cyclist for the foundation that helps people with cancer to survive. The athlete also induced developing centers for studies linked with treatment of cancer. The Dallas Morning News mentioned also about achievements of the sportsman which were done during his cycling career. Since young age Lance Armstrong succeeded in cycling. He got many awards. Lance Armstrong won Tour de France 7 consecutive times.
Even testicular cancer couldn’t have negative influence on the celebrated cyclist. Although the cancer spread over the body, Lance Armstrong escaped from this dreadful problem. Furthermore, he returned to professional cycling after his treatment and continued succeeding. While all positive actions of Lance Armstrong didn’t make him a finalist for the “Texan of the Year” award, his doping scandal did it. Of course, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) contributed to his award. A dossier on Lance Armstrong’s doping case was released by the USADA. Moreover, the cyclist’s sponsors left him after it was proven that he had doped. So, many individuals were convinced that the cyclist had applied forbidden medicines.
Texans praised Lance Armstrong, when he succeeded in sports. But when this sportsman crashed, they started to demonize him. It is not surprisingly because this is the nature of Texans. While they prefer to make several individuals heroes, they prefer to blame them too.