Prevention of high hematocrit levels

The boxer Tony Thompson states that steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs should be legalized in boxing. The sportsman claims that anti-doping laws and gun laws are similar. Who keeps gun laws? Only good guys do it. As a result, good guys are at a disadvantage. Thus, the similar situation is linked with anti-doping rules. Just honest sportsmen don’t administer anabolic steroids and/or other doping products. Thus, they fight with those who have enhanced their performance with the help of anabolic steroids and other related medications.
It is stated that anabolic steroids are not permitted in sports because they are dangerous. What would you say about boxing in itself? Is boxing safe? The answer is evident.
But it is also stated that it is necessary to ban steroids and other related products in order to make boxing safer. Steroids and other doping products enhance performance. The more increased performance is, the more dangerous rounds are. Although it is true, would you prohibit anything which promotes performance of boxers? So, you prohibit anabolic steroids because they enhance performance. Then ban trainings as well since they increase performance too! So, you will reduce performance while minimizing possible risks. What do you think about this aspect?
The boxer Tony Thompson also adds that detection tests are not efficient at all. While many athletes administer banned products, only some of them are caught and sentenced to suspensions. So, dopers have unfair advantage over those who keep anti-doping rules. There is no logic.
Undoubtedly, arguments provided by Tony Thompson are reasonable. Anti-doping laws make rounds more unfair. Furthermore, the prohibition of doping doesn’t make fights safer. Numerous boxers continue to use steroids and/or other forbidden medications without being caught. They continue to fight and have success with the help of doping, while good guys are at a disadvantage because they don’t break anti-doping rules.
Thus, if doping is legalized in boxing, matches will be more honest. Undoubtedly, they will remain unsafe. But they will be at least fair.
The boxer Tony Thompson has been harshly criticized for his arguments pro legalization of doping in boxing.

Why did Oscar Pistorius kill Reeva Steenkamp?

Oscar Pistorius admitted that he had murdered his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp. But the athlete stated that he had shot her because he had mistaken her for an intruder.
Police officers try to determine why the Olympic athlete really killed Reeva Steenkamp. They discovered anabolic steroids at his home.
Since anabolic steroids have been discovered in Oscar’s bedroom, it would be probably argued that anabolic steroids caused uncontrolled behavior in the athlete. Anabolic steroids would be blamed for the murder.
In fact, you should recognize that it is quite hardly to claim that anabolic steroids are responsible for aggression and violent behavior. Researches linked with this issue are quite limited. According to results of some researches, steroid users are predisposed to aggression, paranoia, jealousy, etc. It is stated that those who apply anabolic steroids are more likely to commit crimes than those who have nothing to do with these products. But it is important to take in consideration that anabolic steroids may just contribute to aggression. Only these drugs alone can’t cause aggression. They turn out to be only contributive factors. Other factors should be also present for appearing of aggression. Circumstances play essential role in such cases. So, it is even impossible to define whether anabolic steroids cause aggression or several circumstances. Violent cases should be viewed as a complex of steroid use and circumstances.
It is also stated by scientists that increased levels of testosterone are associated with aggression in several individuals. Thus, it is necessary to notice here that while some individuals with elevated testosterone levels experience aggression, others with elevated testosterone levels are not predisposed to uncontrolled violence. This condition differs from one person to another.
You can note that the connection between administration of steroids and violence is a complicated issue. Scientists have not studied this condition well enough to implicate it. Thus, if defense lawyers of the Olympic athlete want to argue that anabolic steroids have made their client to murder his girlfriend, they should understand that they are going to utilize controversial statements.

Let athletes be masters upon own bodies!

It is not necessary to subject athletes to tests for performance-enhancing substances. Numerous cases display that tests for forbidden preparations are not efficacious. Moreover, it is important to realize that application of tests by anti-doping officers is not logical at Olympics. The main purpose of Olympic sportspersons is following: to become faster, stronger and to be at the top level. Thus, why should you keep sportspersons far from medications that could help them to reach this result?
As you know, steroids and other related preparations boost performance. So, athletes should be allowed to take these remedies in order to enhance physical performance.
A lot of persons say that anabolic steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs make competitions unfair. Is this point of view true? No, it wrong. You should understand that tests for anabolic steroids and other related preparations make competitions unfair. Numerous sportspersons take performance-enhancing drugs while avoiding detection. Thus, some athletes apply anabolic steroids; others don’t break anti-doping rules. As a result, dopers have unfair advantage over non-dopers. It’s unfair. Let all sportspersons have similar access to doping products. So, competitions will be fairer.
But debating about unfairness in sports, you should not forget about other conditions which have more essential influence of fairness/unfairness than anabolic steroids and other related drugs. Some athletes live in developed countries; others are in less developed countries. Certain athletes have money to get needed equipment; others can’t afford it. Certain countries can sponsor sportspersons, coaches, sport physicians and managers; others are not capable to do it. So, unfairness should be noticed here.
Olympic sportspersons spend much time while training. They sacrifice time, money, etc. That’s why it is illogical to disqualify those that are caught administering anabolic steroids and other doping products.
While sportspersons are sentenced to suspensions for intake of steroids and some other chemical substances, they are never banned for application of herbs and certain potions. It is claimed that anabolic steroids and other chemical substances are banned in sports because they can boost athletic performance. But what is for herbs and potions? They are also able to increase energy. Nevertheless, these remedies are not prohibited in sports.  Chinese athletes take herbal remedies and win.
Of course, you may argue that anabolic steroids and certain other products may result in severe negative consequences. Undoubtedly, several forbidden products may cause serious health troubles. But those who intend to take these products do own research. They are aware of potential dangers. Let athletes decide whether it is worthy to take such medications. If they are ready to worsen health, let them do it because they should manage own bodies.

Anti-doping agencies will never “defeat” dopers

What is your opinion related to legalization of doping in sports?  Certain persons say that it is time to legalize it. Others don’t agree. What do you believe?
Those that are against legalization of doping in sports say that steroids and other related drugs represent essential evil. They may cause severe negative reactions in consumers. Furthermore, a doper has unfair advantage over a non-doper during competitions.
According to another opinion, usage of steroids and other doping products should be permitted in sports. Let sportspersons take whatever they desire! If they desire to use anabolic steroids, let them do it! If they intend to use other products, let them do it! If they desire to take several preparations, let physicians assist their application! Health care providers know what their patients should do in order to avoid several undesirable reactions. Thus, doping products will not lead to serious undesirable reactions. As a result, usage of anabolic steroids and other related medications will be relatively safe for health and life of consumers.
As you know, anabolic steroids and other doping products are currently forbidden in sports. When sportspersons are suspected and/or found guilty of doping, scandals appear. Such cases are widely discussed during TV shows, in magazines, newspapers, on internet, etc. You must know that every scandal usually contains not only truth but also gossips, exaggerations, etc. As a result, you can’t be sure whether certain affirmations are true or not.
Those that are against legalization of doping in sports claim that sportspersons enhance performance unnaturally with the help of steroids and other related medicines. Speaking about enhancement of athletic performance, you should remember about enhancement of sexual performance, cognitive skills, improvement of health, etc. Why do we apply several drugs and supplements, improving our health and life, while demonizing sportspersons who try to promote performance with steroids and other doping products? Isn’t it hypocrisy? You would note that anabolic steroids and certain other performance-enhancing drugs lead to health problems. Yes, it is true. But what do you consider about usage of caffeine and nicotine? They are accepted in the society. But it is necessary to note that caffeine and nicotine cause more serious health troubles than anabolic steroids and other related medicines. Nonetheless, consumers of caffeine and nicotine are not so harshly criticized, as consumers of steroids.
Anti-doping agencies consider that they will soon eliminate doping from sports. “Competitions will be fair”, - they exclaim. But it is necessary to realize that doping will be never eradicated from sports. Anti-doping officials will not be ever capable to do it. While they introduce new tests and enhance penalties for administration of prohibited substances, athletes find new ways to avoid detection. So, anyone should comprehend that this “game” will never end, if doping is not legalized in sports.

Anti-aging clinics provide illegal drugs to sportspersons

Numerous anti-aging clinics are linked with doping scandals. It’s not surprisingly because they supply athletes and bodybuilders with anabolic steroids and other related medications. When proper authorities search anti-aging clinics and confiscate documents, they find out that certain celebrated sport figures are clients of the clinics.
Lately several anti-aging clinics located in Miami were investigated. Feds determined that the clinics offered prescription drugs for sale illegally. The clinics sold preparations for increase of muscle mass, weight loss, increase of endurance, etc.
According to the newspaper the Miami New Times, the anti-aging clinic Biogenesis was found guilty of illicit sale of performance-enhancing drugs. Moreover, such prominent baseball players, as Alex Rodriquez and Melky Cabrera bought doping products at Biogenesis of America. Thus, the anti-aging clinic appeared to be linked with one of the biggest doping scandals in baseball.
Medical records of Biogenesis were received from an employee of the clinic. The records were displayed on the site of the newspaper Miami New Times. Reporters noticed that the employee who provided the records didn’t want to be identified.
It is reported that anabolic steroids, HGH, IGF-1 and other prescription medications are widely offered for sale illegally by anti-aging clinics. Moreover, clinics hire doctors who provide fake prescriptions. Prescriptions for steroids and other related products are often given to clients without proper evaluation of their individual conditions. Moreover, doctors provide prescriptions even without seeing their patients. In additions to these aspects, certain corrupt doctors permit anti-aging clinics to use their prescription pads. So, anti-aging clinics sell steroids, painkillers and other prescription medicines illegally, as if they worked legally.
When illegal activities of anti-aging clinics become obvious, owners of clinics, doctors and certain employees are sentenced to certain penalties. Nevertheless, the risk to receive punishment doesn’t stop clinics from their illegal activities. Although proper authorities try to eradicate illegal sale of prescription medications, their success is not yet essential.

Steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs should be legalized in sports

Numerous professional athletes acquired steroids and other doping products from Biogenesis, a Miami anti-aging clinic. The famous baseball stars Alex Rodriquez, Melky Cabrera and Bartolo Colon also belonged to persons who bought anabolic steroids at this clinic.
What is uncommon here? - Nothing. Steroids and other related medications are widely administered in baseball and in other sports. Athletes buy these medicines at pharmacies, clinics, etc. A lot of anti-ageing clinics, pharmaceutical companies and other related establishments sell anabolic steroids and other doping products illegally. The Miami clinic Biogenesis is not the only clinic that is involved in illegal actions linked with anabolic steroids and other prescription medicines. Athletes find different methods to buy anabolic steroids and other related medications and use them. However anti-doping agencies try to eliminate doping from sports, their efforts are not successful.
Do you consider that anti-doping officers don’t work enough well? Do you believe that they should establish more sophisticated drug testing programs? Do you claim that they don’t do their job appropriately?
It is needed to realize that no any drug testing policy is able to eliminate doping from sports entirely. Athletes find many methods to avoid detection. Doping is a part of sports. It exists from ancient time. Even ancient Greeks and Romans had some methods to enhance their performance to win. Will athletes discontinue administering steroids and other related medications now?
Several sportspersons get undetectable preparations and administer them. Furthermore, they hire specialists that supply them with recommendations on intake of anabolic steroids and/or other performance-enhancing drugs. So, some athletes have unfair advantage over others. Anti-doping officers can’t change the situation. They are not able to make sports “clean”. What is it needed to do under such circumstances? It is probably better to legalize doping in professional sports. So, anyone will be permitted to use whatever he/she wants. As a result, no any sportsperson will have unfair advantage over another.
But since steroids and other related products are forbidden in sports, athletes try to find methods to buy and use these medicines, avoiding detection. When it becomes evident that certain athletes dope, scandals are reported.

Links between Lance Armstrong’s steroid use and testicular cancer

However the disgraced American cyclist Lance Armstrong has already lost his 7 Tour de France titles and other awards, his doping scandal is still widely debated. Numerous indidivuals are still expressing their thoughts linked with this case. Not only his alleged intake of performance-enhancing drugs is disputed but certain persons also speak about Lance Armstrong’s testicular cancer. Why has Lance Armstrong got this disease in his young years? What has caused this disease in him?
Whoopi Goldberg, a famous American actress is also involved in debates linked with Lance Armstrong’s doping scandal. While she has been mainly implicated in debates linked with marijuana and other related drugs, now she has chosen to join those who fight against steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs.
According to Whoopi Goldberg, Lance Armstrong has got testicular cancer because of anabolic steroids. The actress claims that anabolic steroids are likely to cause cancer. She argues that these medicines may promote appearing and developing cancer. Whoopi Goldberg considers that specialists should inform people about potential tights between anabolic steroids and cancer. The actress notices that specialists can find out whether steroids have sickened Lance Armstrong.
But what do other famous persons think about Lance Armstrong’s testicular cancer? Bob Weiner, a prominent political commentator, notes that anyone should be very careful while expressing suggestions that anabolic steroids are responsible for development of cancer. This man acknowledges that these medications cause many unwanted effects which are quite harmful for consumers’ health and even life. But he notes that it is unusual to demonize anabolic steroids for cancer. Such statements are serious. Bob Weiner thinks that this issue has nothing to do with anti-doping morality.
Nevertheless, Bob Weiner is inclined to believe that Lance Armstrong’s testicular cancer has been caused by anabolic steroids. This illness usually doesn’t occur in young persons. Why then has Lance Armstrong got it? Since scientific literature supposes that connections between cancer and steroid use may exist, Bob Weiner doesn’t deny affirmations of Whoopi Goldberg.
But as it has been already noted, this issue is not included in those of anti-doping programs. Anti-doping officials focus on morality and they don’t care about protection of sportspeople’s health.

Some rules on pharmacies contain ambiguity

The fungal meningitis outbreak that started in September last year had substantial impact upon America. Contaminated injectable steroids were manufactured by the New England Compounding Center (located in Massachusetts) and applied by a lot of persons. As a result, over 400 individuals were contaminated with fungal meningitis in more than 20 states. 39 individuals sickened with this disease died. 14 deaths happened in Tennessee.
It became evident that it needed to do something for prevention of such cases. Contamination must not take place in future. The FDA had to meet with representatives of all states for discussion of this situation. So, recently a conference took place in order to find ways linked with prevention of contamination in the future.
It was underlined during the conference that new rules on compounding pharmacies should be introduced.
Representatives of certain states claimed that they did suitable job in their states and no any person experienced troubles related to contamination. Moreover, they underlined critically that they were not aware of what occurred in other states.
When it comes to the FDA, its authority over such cases is limited. Federal court cases which were during past years depressed the authority of the FDA evidentially. In addition to these problems, several laws seem to be unclear.
Margaret Hamburg, the FDA Commissioner, proposed to improve the situation through the following changes:
- to control training of state regulators;
- to induce sharing information between the FDA and states;
- to get rid of ambiguity in rules.

These proposals seem to be fair. Such changes must help to promote improving public health of Americans. Of course, if rules contain ambiguity, no any agreement will be reached. That’s why new laws should be elaborated and existing rules should be altered.
The FDA believes that state regulators will cooperate with it in order to prevent producing and shipping contaminated drugs.

Would you support Roger Clemens, if you were voter?

Fans of baseball and a lot of other individuals seem to be anxious by results of voting for the Hall of Fame. Some great players have not been elected for the Baseball Hall of Fame. It is quite naturally that you also ask why they have not been supported. Under rules of voting, those that have displayed great baseball abilities and contributed to their teams significantly should be elected. Undoubtedly, such baseball players, as Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire and some other sportsmen have displayed amazing abilities and achievements while playing professionally. Why haven’t they entered the Baseball Hall of Fame?
A lot of voters say that they will never support those that have ever been linked to steroids and/or other doping products. Dopers should be sanctioned. Future generations should see that they will never actually succeed, if they take performance-enhancing drugs.
What would you do, if you were a member of the Baseball Writers’ Association of America? Would you support steroid users?
Actually, voters never possess full information about admitted and suspected consumers of steroids. You can’t prove that Roger Clemens has really taken doping products. A lot of persons have suspicions but there is no any proof. How may voters refuse to support this baseball player? Are they sure that he has used steroids and other prohibited preparations? –No, they aren’t. That’s why it is wrong to keep Roger Clemens out of the Baseball Hall of Fame only because of suspicions.
While some voters are ready to support suspected consumers of steroids, they claim that they will never vote for an admitted steroid user. Although it seems to be right, let analyze the situation better! Have anabolic steroids played any great role in success of certain baseball player? For example, if even Roger Clemens has applied performance-enhancing drugs, it is possible to convince anyone that he has had great success not because of steroids. Amazing achievements of this well-known baseball player have been demonstrated before his alleged steroid use. According to some statements, Roger Clemens has taken steroids since 1998 and then in 2000 and 2001.  But the most amazing accomplishments have been done by him before 1998. So, nobody can state that anabolic steroids have helped Roger Clemens to have such great success. That’s why he should enter the Hall of Fame.
Furthermore, why are many persons inclined to blame just steroid users? Isn’t it the society that presses sportspeople to start taking steroids and other related medications?

It is impossible to contest achievements of Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Mike Piazza

Such prominent baseball players, as Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Mike Piazza, have not enter the Baseball Hall of Fame. Is it fair? These sportspersons have reached excellent results while playing professional baseball. But it is claimed that there is no any place for steroid users in the Hall of Fame.
So, certain individuals think that if steroid users are introduced into the Hall of Fame, it will have negative influence for future generations. Young individuals should realize that great baseball players are those that haven’t doped. Actually, it is nonsense. Barry Bonds, Mike Piazza and Roger Clemens are always claimed to be the best baseball players. If even they are not introduced into the Hall of Fame, they will be always praised. These sportspersons have reached splendid results. Nobody can doubt about their accomplishments.
Let analyze logically. For example, you see the most beautiful girl in the town. But she fails to win Miss of America. Does she lose its beauty? Do you discontinue admiring of her beauty just because she hasn’t acquired the title of Miss of America? Answers are obvious. The same case is with Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds and Mike Piazza. They are brilliant players, regardless whether they will be elected fot the Hall of Fame or not.
Barry Bonds obtained several MVPs before he was associated with steroids. Roger Clemens became celebrated for his baseball skills before he was accused of doping. When it comes to Mike Piazza, nobody can contest that he is one of the best catchers.
It is stated that the Baseball Hall of Fame is the place for the best baseball players that have ever played the game. Let suggest that Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Mike Piazza are not included in this category. Then we must introduce another category within the Baseball Hall of Fame. These players must be the Hall of Fame. Otherwise, it loses its importance. Since the Hall of Fame is associated with greatness, it can’t exist without such great players, as Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Mike Piazza. Barry Bonds made games exciting. He showed amazing baseball skills long before he was accused of doping. The same things may be said about Roger Clemens and Mike Piazza. The Hall of Fame loses its importance without these famous players. That’s why it is important to take in consideration these aspects and change the attitude to these players and the Hall of Fame. Otherwise, the integrity of baseball will be destructed.

Any athlete should be allowed to take steroids for medical needs

Administration of steroids for testosterone replacement therapy by sportspeople is a controversial issue. There are numerous debates connected with it. It is known by everyone that steroids and some other related medications are prohibited in many sports organizations. But if a person should take these products under guidelines of his/her doctor for therapeutic needs, he/she should receive a therapeutic use exemption. Although it is permitted to administer even anabolic steroids for clinical purposes, such sportspersons are frequently blamed and named “cheaters”. Actually, it is not fair.
What does Dana White, the UFC president, believe about usage of steroids for testosterone replacement therapy? Does he demonize fighters that administer steroids in order to increase their low levels of testosterone? Dana White considers that any person with hypogonadism should use steroids, if these medications are indicated by his doctor. Although it is fair, let notice why some sportspersons have low testosterone levels. It is proven scientifically that steroid abuse may cause suppression of natural testosterone secretion. So, certain fighters and other sportspersons that have used previously steroids for performance-enhancing effects may experience hypogonadism. Hence, their physicians recommend them applying some steroids in order to increase their testosterone levels.
According to the UFC president, testosterone replacement therapy is legal for all individuals, including professional sportspersons. So, if any athlete experiences hypogonadism, he should be allowed to apply steroids indicated by his health care provider. He should reach normal testosterone levels that characterize any healthy man of his age.
But Dana White makes it clear that any fighter or another sportsperson that administers anabolic steroids and/or other banned drugs for athletic purposes must be sentenced to bans. It is necessary to make difference between those that take steroids for medical needs and those that desire to gain muscle mass and strength with the help these preparations. No one is allowed to use anabolic steroids for performance-enhancing effects. It is forbidden in sports. Those that violate anti-doping rules must be punished. Sports must be free from doping.
It seems to be strange that statements of Dana White differ substantially from statements presented by anti-doping officials. As you know, words of some anti-doping officers for steroid users are much harsher than those said by the UFC president.

Less than 1% of college athletes are caught doping

A few college athletes are caught using banned products. Does it mean that they don’t use doping products? Less than 1% of college football players have been caught violating anti-doping policies. They have tested positive for steroids and/or other doping products. Such situation must convince anti-doping agencies that they win in the fight against doping. But certain suspicions appear. It is believed that numerous college football players use anabolic steroids and/or other related medicines but they avoid detection successfully.
Why do such suspicions appear? Changes in appearance of college football players lead to controversial points of view. Thus, changes in body weight of over 61,000 college football players were lately analyzed by the Associated Press. Results demonstrated that a lot of college football players increased their body mass in short period of time obviously. Over 20 pounds were acquired by more than 4,500 college football players during a year. Furthermore, near 100 persons increased the body weight by more than 80 pounds during a year. As you see, the gains were evident.
Some experts assure that these aspects should not trouble anti-doping agencies. They claim that anti-doping officers shouldn’t subject college football players to drug tests only because they have enhanced body mass significantly.
But other experts have another point of view. Although they agree that it is impossible to be sure that certain football players have taken anabolic steroids and/or other related drugs, basing just upon changes in body mass, they notice that the changes may be a factor which causes suspicions connected with usage of steroids. So, such individuals that have increased body weight in short time should be subjected to drug testing.
Several college athletes that increased body mass obviously in short period of time were asked about their changes. The football players affirmed that they had never taken any forbidden medicines. They claimed that they achieved such amazing changes naturally. The college athletes noted that they had consumed much food for this purpose. So, they claimed that such essential results were achieved by them because of proper nutrition. According to them, it was not difficult to get many pounds in short period of time.

Freddie Roach: it is necessary to get rid of strength and conditioning coaches to clean boxing

Freddie Roach is a well-known American trainer in boxing. He coaches the well-known boxer Manny Pacquiao. The trainer claims that he knows the best way to eradicate the problem of steroid use in boxing. According to this coach, strength and conditioning coaches should be demonized for application of steroids and other related preparations in this sport. He thinks that they teach boxers to administer doping products. So, the trainer Freddie Roach notes that it is needed to get rid of every strength and conditioning coach. It will lead to eliminating of doping from boxing.
What does Freddie Roach think about significant changes that have occurred in physique and performance of Juan Manuel Marquez. Actually, there are different points of view about this boxer and significant changes in him. Many individuals believe that he has administered steroids which have induced these changes in him. When it comes to Freddie Roach, he believes that Angel Guillermo Memo Heredia has provided anabolic steroids to Juan Manuel Marquez.
Memo Heredia is an admitted distributor of steroids. He acknowledged that he had provided steroids to numerous top athletes. Since he collaborated with federal prosecutors and revealed names of some sportspersons that used anabolic steroids, he was not charged with any crimes linked with distribution of anabolic steroids.
So, the trainer Freddie Roach believes that strength and conditioning coaches like Memo Heredia should be pushed from boxing. It is the best method to eradicate application of anabolic steroids and other related products from boxing.
It is interesting to note that Manny Pacquiao, Freddie Roach’s client, also has a strength coach. Does it mean that this famous boxer administers anabolic steroids and/or other related preparations? The trainer Freddie Roach thinks that the strength coach Alex Arizo doesn’t supply Manny Pacquiao with steroids.
Alex Arizo and Memo Heredia are friends. Thus, Alex Arizo puts efforts to defend his friend, claiming that Freddie Roach’s accusations are false. In fact, the trainer Freddie Roach says that he doesn’t like to pronounce any accusations linked with intake of anabolic steroids and other related medications. But he has to do it because this is the nature of boxing.
While Alex Arizo affirms that Memo Heredia doesn’t provide steroids to Marquez, Freddie Roach has own point of view. He continues to believe that Marquez is tainted. According to Freddie Roach, dramatic physical transformations of this athlete display that he administers steroids and/or other doping products.

Lance Armstrong should not be demonized for usage of doping products in cycling

Although you probably never heard about Scott Mercier, his affirmations linked with usage of steroids and other related drugs in professional cyclist spread very quickly. This sportsman belonged to the US Postal Cycling team prior to Lance Armstrong’s arrival. Some statements of Scott Mercier discovered the truth that was hidden in cycling.
In fact, the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) made incorrect conclusions linked with role of Lance Armstrong in doping. The famous American cyclist was accused and found guilty of intake of forbidden preparations throughout his cycling career. While it may be true, the USADA affirmed that Lance Armstrong induced doping in professional cycling. But these statements turned out to be wrong. Why? Which words were said by Scott Mercier?
Scott Mercier claimed that their team doctor Pedro Celaya had a special program for the US Postal Cycling team. He discussed about the program with every cyclist. The doctor said that they had to ride 200-250 km each day. Moreover, the doctor organized doping program that had to accompany trainings. Thus, he supplied US Postal Cycling team’s athletes with steroids, EPO and several other preparations.
These recommendations were offered by Pedro Celaya, when Lance Armstrong didn’t ride professionally. This sportsman experienced testicular cancer that time. There was no any doubt that this person would not be able to ride professionally. His cancer spread on other parts of his body, including brain. After this man experienced chemotherapy he got recovery. So, Lance Armstrong didn’t have any relation to the team. He didn’t promote taking doping products in professional cycling. It became obvious that doping was organized by Pedro Celaya before Lance Armstrong’s arrival.
During 1990s professional riders administered Andriol. Then they administered testosterone patches. Under guidelines of Pedro Celaya riders used the method of overdosing in order to avoid detection by anti-doping officers.

Why are sports nutrition stores’ clerks caught selling steroids easily?

Sports nutrition shops offer for sale not only true dietary supplements. They market steroidal substances as nutrition supplements and offer them for sale. But authorities put efforts to control and prevent distribution of steroids as if they were just supplements. That’s why clerks of sports nutrition stores offer steroids for sale illegally. Those that come to such stores are frequently informed that they may buy steroids as well.
 But these factors are known not only by consumers of steroids but also by police officers. So, police officers conduct undercover investigations in order to bust sports nutrition shops that sell steroids. Clerks should understand that if a client desires to get steroids, arranging a deal outside the store, he must be an undercover police officer. That’s why those who are involved in illicit operations connected with sale of steroids should be quite careful to avoid legal troubles. However they know about these factors, they make typical mistakes that lead to arrests, charges and jail.
Let present a story about a clerk of the General Nutrition Centers (GNC) store located in East Walpole (Massachusetts). George Touma sold anabolic steroids along with dietary supplements. When police officers were informed about illicit actions of this man, they began to conduct an investigation. The investigation lasted about a month and was led by The Walpole Police Department.
An undercover agent came to the store often and purchased dietary supplements. He was talking to the clerk quite frequently. Thus, a friendly relation was formed. Finally they discussed about anabolic steroids. The undercover officer said that he would like to purchase anabolic steroids. Thus, he agreed to obtain two vials of steroids from George Touma. The agent had to pay $300 for the drugs. The deal was arranged outside the shop. After the purchase had taken place police officers detained the clerk.
As a result, the clerk of the GNC was charged with illegal possession and sale of steroids.

Patrick Jonker: doping is serious problem in cycling

The USADA has released a dossier on the prominent cyclist Lance Armstrong.
Which impression do people get, when they read this report? It is said that a lot of persons think that every teammate of this prominent cyclist has applied steroids and/or other related preparations. But is it true opinion? Has each Lance Armstrong’s teammate doped?
According to the report on this athlete, 11 teammates testified against him, claiming that he doped. Furthermore, it was confirmed that Lance Armstrong and the most mates of his team used sophisticated methods in order to be able to dope and prevent detection.
However some Lance Armstrong’s teammates admitted to taking steroids and/or other related preparations, some teammates denied doping. For example, Julian Dean and Patrick Jonker were two teammates of the celebrated cyclist that denied administering performance-enhancing drugs.
Julian Dean said that he neither doped, nor saw Lance Armstrong applying anabolic steroids and/or other related medications.
When it comes to Patrick Jonker, his affirmations were like those of Julian Dean. He confirmed that he had never applied any banned preparations. He stated that he competed cleanly and didn’t take any unfair advantage.
According to Patrick Jonker, application of anabolic steroids and other related remedies is a serious problem in their sport. He thinks that a lot of cyclists dope. He considers that it is necessary to fight against intake of doping products in cycling. But he claims that appropriate methods should be used by anti-doping officers. This athlete is full of indignation, talking about prosecution related to Lance Armstrong.  Patrick Jonker affirms that murderers are less prosecuted than the celebrated cyclist.

War on steroids

Timothy Armstrong of the World Health Organization claims that anabolic steroids are dangerous for public health. While these products are frequently used by athletes, bodybuilders and ordinary people for increase of muscles and energy, they may have negative impact on physical and mental health of users. Unfortunately, dangers related to these drugs are not attended seriously. Although many specialists warn that these products may lead to dangerous undesirable effects, many individuals continue to administer them for performance-enhancing effects.
Timothy Armstrong puts efforts to protect public health. He has presented a speech about intake of steroids at a conference organized by the chairman of the International Olympic Committee Arne Ljungqvist. Thus, Timothy Armstrong helps to eliminate illegal administration of steroids.
When it comes to Arne Ljungqvist, he put efforts in order to fight against intake of steroids in sports. According to this person, administration of steroids represents a moral problem. Those that administer performance-enhancing don’t compete fairly. They have unfair advantage over those who don’t apply these medicines. Thus, they act improperly.
Of course, Arne Ljungqvist is happy that Timothy Armstrong is also against intake of steroids. He confirms that anti-doping agencies should work with the World Health Organization more closely. The united efforts will be able to eradicate application of performance-enhancing drugs from professional sports.
Timothy Armstrong affirms that anti-doping agencies should have direct links with law enforcements and customs officers. If they work together, their war on illegal deals linked with steroids and other controlled substances will be more successful. They should inform each other about individuals that have something to do with illegal medicines. Thus, they will have ability to achieve their goals.

Teenagers should know that steroids affect brain

Leslie Henderson worries about teenagers. She is troubled because numerous adolescents use anabolic steroids which may be dangerous for them. These drugs may make adolescents aggressive. Moreover, steroids may affect various systems of users. According to Leslie Henderson, the most dangerous aspect related to usage of these medicines by adolescents is following: these preparations influence on the brain negatively. They affect not only functions of the brain; they also change the way it works.
Anabolic steroids have been elaborated in order to treat several health disorders. These products are able to induce development of secondary male characteristics in males with delayed puberty. They have ability to prevent muscle wasting in persons that suffer from HIV/AIDS and other diseases. But these preparations are also widely abused. They are used for increase of muscle mass and strength. When doctors recommend applying steroids to cure certain health problems, they indicate relatively decreased dosages which don’t produce grave adverse results. When these drugs are administered for performance-enhancing effects, measures are increased. But it is important to know that high dosages may cause serious undesirable reactions.
Non-therapeutic application of steroids is very dangerous for adolescents. Their systems have not been yet developed. That’s why these products may cause irreversible changes in them. Steroids may destroy their physical as well psychological health of adolescents. As a result, adverse results of steroids are manifested in them not only during adolescence but also when they grow up. If adult individuals abuse steroids, they usually don’t suffer from such prolonged grave undesirable effects, as teenagers experience. That’s why Leslie Henderson and other experts confirm that it is necessary to warn teenagers about negative influence of steroids on them. They should know about all probable dangers. If teenagers know about dangerous side consequences of steroids, they will probably discontinue using these medications for improvement of appearance and performance.

Anna Watson made correct decision

When it is mentioned about cheerleaders, we imagine active and slim women. But we have to realize that sometimes the reality differs from our imagination. The cheerleader Anna Watson is an example in this case. She has great muscles. But she is very beautiful.
A fitness modeling agency offered her a $75000 contract. But she didn’t agree to obtain it. Actually, it is surprisingly because numerous ladies want to obtain such contracts. But she didn’t want to get it because she had to take steroids for this purpose.
When Anna Watson began to study at Hawaii Pacific University, she started weight lifting. The lady trained hardly and consumed about 3000 calorie per day. Ultimately she was able to lift 230 pounds. But her weight was not enough to get a modeling fitness contract. However she consumed much protein, she could not get needed pounds.
A modeling agent said that the steroid Anavar could help her to enhance weight. Anna Watson needed to add 50 pounds in order to get the contract. So, she began to take Anavar in order to add body mass. She was eating “forever”, even if she wasn’t’ hungry. Despites of her efforts, nutrition regimen and administration of Anavar, she was not able to add 50 pounds. She added just 10 pounds.
Anna Watson is a religious person. She belongs to a local church. Ultimately, she made a decision to ask a weight lifting champion for advice. Hugh Kirby that is also a member of the church has recommended her to be far from application of steroids. He mentioned that these drugs could lead to different negative reactions. This man also noted that steroids could cause infertility. Thus, Hugh Kirby confirmed that it would be better to refuse the contract instead of getting health troubles, especially infertility.
So, Anna Watson didn’t agree to get the contract. But she decided not to leave her trainings. She desires to become a personal trainer.
Actually, Anna Watson made a proper decision. It is reasonable to keep female features without a modeling contract instead of having the contract and experiencing virilizing effects on account of steroid use.

Steroid use is dangerous in football

A lot of articles note about intake of steroids in baseball. Sportswriters and reporters describe steroid scandals which occur in this sport. It is often discussed about steroid era in baseball. MLB players are required to submit to many drug tests. It seems that each person interested in sports demonizes baseball players for application of performance-enhancing drugs. Do only baseball players administer steroids and other related products? What do you believe about football players? Do they dope? Why do we demonize only baseball players for usage of banned medications?
Application of doping products is widespread among football players. Since 1960s intake of performance-enhancing drugs plays a significant role in this sport. It is impossible to imagine football without usage of steroids and other related medications.
Strength and size are important features in football. Certain persons believe that football players possess great strength just because of hard trainings and suitable diets. But it is a wrong opinion. A lot of football players administer forbidden substances in order to add strength and enhance muscle size.
As you see, usage of forbidden preparations is widespread in football. Nevertheless, baseball players are more harshly blamed for usage of steroids and other related medicines. Such baseball players, as Jose Canseco, Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds were subjected to public shame because of steroid use. But such football players, as Lyle Alzado, Shawne Merriman, Chris Cooper and Thomas Romanowski, also administered forbidden preparations. Nonetheless, they were not so widely blamed, as dopers in baseball.
Furthermore, it is necessary to take in consideration that usage of steroids is related to more risks in football.
It is confirmed that football is unlikely to be cleaned from doping.