D. J. Williams and Ryan McBean… Why are they banned?

The National Football League banned the linebacker D. J. Williams and Ryan McBean, a defensive lineman, of the team Denver Broncos for violation of steroid policy. They were suspended from six games. But they were not banned for usage of steroids. They didn’t test positive for steroids or other prohibited medicines. They were accused in providing “non-human” urine samples to the officer of drug testing.
D. J. William affirmed that he had never tested for any banned medicine during 8 years of his career. The football player noted that he was proud of his records. The linebacker of the NFL noticed that he was also proud of his manner in that he conducted himself, being a sportsman.
Peter Schaffer, the defensive attorney for McBean, stated that the NFL had violated rights of this player. He noticed that since McBean had never tested positive for any forbidden preparation, the NFL didn’t have any right to suspend him.
Peter Schaffer noted that he desired to make it clear that neither D. J. Williams, nor Ryan McBean tested positive for banned products.
A lawsuit was filed in Denver County Court against suspensions of these players of the NFL.
The players stated that the drug testing officer had violated certain rules linked with the procedure of collecting urine samples.
Schaffer noted that several similarities had been between his client and Ryan Braun. Braun won his appeal related to his suspension from 50 games for intake of testosterone. Ryan Braun could prove that Dino Laurenzi, the drug testing officer, violated steroid policy.
As for Laurenzi, he was defended and supported by various anti-doping agencies. The WADA also supported him. It was claimed that there was the same procedure of collecting and sending urine samples not only for the MLB but also for the WADA.
But as for the drug testing officer that collected samples of Williams and McBean, he was treated in another way. He was fired by the NFL for improper doing his duty.
At the hearing the NFL administrators admitted that the drug testing officer violated the rules linked with collection of urine samples.
Nonetheless, the appeal on behalf of the players was rejected.