Violation of athletes’ rights by anti-doping agencies

Lawmakers of California state that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of athletes suspected of steroid use. So, sportspersons that have never tested positive for any prohibited drugs are targeted. That’s why the legislators presented a request to Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored mainly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars each year. This governmental office induces fighting against application of prohibited preparations. Its goal is to exterminate illegal manufacture and drug use, crimes linked with intake of illegal products, etc.
The request of California legislators was initiated soon after Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime ban from professional sports.
Everyone knows that the celebrated cyclist Lance Armstrong has lost his 7 titles obtained at Tour de France. He was also banned from competitions wholly.
In June Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, affirming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks didn’t desire to accept the lawsuit. He said that the USADA acted properly. Sam Sparks also noticed that the USADA was established in order to clean sports from those that use forbidden medicines.
California Senator Michael Rubio noted that Sam Sparks didn’t act properly, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. So, the senators stated that the USADA violated rights of certain sportspersons. That’s why they presented the request before Congress.

Barry Bonds sees that cyclists are prosecuted like baseball players

Barry Bonds knows what a sportsperson experiences, when he/she is pursued by feds and anti-doping officers. He understands what this individual feels. That’s why the former professional baseball player can sympathize and support athletes suspected of doping. So, Barry Bonds supports Lance Armstrong, the seven-time Tour de France winner.
During an interview a journalist asked Barry Bonds about problems of Lance Armstrong connected with doping accusations. The former baseball player showed his admiration towards the cyclist. He claimed that Lance Armstrong was the most brilliant cyclist that has ever been in the sport of cycling.
Of course, Barry Bonds realizes what he says. He knows what it means to be a good cyclist. After this sportsperson retired from baseball, he became a cyclist. He participated in certain competitions successfully. Being a cyclist, he sees that this sport has the same issues like baseball. He understands that cyclists are targeted by the government and anti-doping officials like professional baseball players.
Both Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were suspected of doping. They were investigated by the government and anti-doping officials.
Feds accused Barry Bonds of lying about usage of forbidden drugs and obstruction of justice. They couldn’t prove that the sportsperson lied about usage of prohibited drugs. But they found him guilty of obstructing justice. Barry Bonds decided to appeal the decision of the court.
When it comes to Lance Armstrong, the government dropped the case against him. But the USADA continued to target the cyclist. The USADA claimed that Lance Armstrong had been using forbidden preparations throughout his cycling career. The cyclist decided to stop fighting against accusations of the anti-doping agency. He lost his Tour de France titles and money he had received at these events.
Although Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his titles, Americans continue to respect him. They claim that he is the most excellent cyclist of all times. Lance Armstrong’s sponsors haven’t refused to support his cancer charity. The former cyclist helps people to fight against cancer. Thus, numerous persons are thankful. They will always remember what Lance Armstrong has done for them.
Barry Bonds’ reputation has been destructed by suspicions related to intake of forbidden medicines. The former baseball player thinks that his achievements during the baseball career are more essential than the accusations. He believes that people will forget about the suspicions and he will be considered to be a baseball star.

Nadezya Ostapchuk consumed food that was mixed with steroid

The Belarusian shot putter Nadezya Ostapchuk received the gold medal at the 2012 London Olympics. But she tested positive for a steroid. As a result, she lost the medal that was given to Valeria Adams of New Zealand.
Two tests manifested that a steroid’s metabolites presented in her urine samples.
When an athlete is caught applying any banned medications, he/she is usually sentenced to a ban of two years. As for this Belarusian shot putter, she received one-year ban. Why was the sentence lighter? There were some circumstances which proved the following condition: the Belarusian shot putter didn’t use any prohibited preparation knowingly.
At the beginning Nadezya Ostapchuk blamed his former coach. She said that he had sabotaged her sample.
The Belarusian National Anti-Doping Agency examined this case. The International Association of Athletic Federation also participated in the investigation. It was found out that Yefimov was guilty. This person added powder of methenolone into food of Nadezya Ostapchuk during the last week before the 2012 Summer Olympics. The coach reported that he had worried about Nadezya Ostapchuk. He believed that this steroid would help to win.
In fact, it is difficult to define why Yefimov has done it. He only made the things worse.
Anti-doping agencies accepted these arguments. That’s why Nadezya Ostapchuk was sentenced just to one-year suspension.
As for supporters of Valeria Adams, they didn’t believe that Nadezya Ostapchuk had not applied the steroid knowingly. They affirmed that Yefimov just tried to protect the athlete. They confirmed that Nadezya Ostapchuk had taken steroids under recommendations of her coach.
If the Belarusian shot putter’s performance was amazing certain months before the 2012 Summer Olympics, her coach had to be sure that she would win. Why did he worry about her performance?

Former girlfriends of several athletes were interviewed by feds

Several sportspersons that are accused of steroid use become targets of the government. Federal prosecutors do almost anything in order to learn whether several athletes have applied any doping products. They don’t spare taxpayers’ funds for this purpose. Much money is spent to reveal even private life of sportspersons. According to the government, several details of their private behavior can disclose the truth about usage of prohibited preparations. Thus, girlfriends of certain athletes are interviewed by federal prosecutors.
For example, it has been revealed that former girlfriends of Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens and a former mistress of Barry Bonds have been asked about certain aspects linked with private life of these sportspersons. Which questions were asked?
Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Barry Bonds, was asked about testicles of this baseball player. She confirmed that the baseball player’s testicles were shrunken. So, her answer served as an argument that Barry Bonds used steroids and/or other prohibited products.
It is known that testicular atrophy belongs to side consequences of some steroids. So, the government decided to learn whether Barry Bonds had had this trouble. But it is a poor argument in order to prove that anyone has administered certain prohibited drugs. Steroid users may avoid this side reaction, if they apply some medications for this need.
Mindy McCready, a former mistress of Roger Clemens, was asked whether this former baseball player had had erectile dysfunctions. The singer claimed that sometimes Roger Clemens had experienced this problem.
When it comes to erectile dysfunctions, they may occur during usage of steroids. But if you study information about unwanted effects of steroids more attentively, you can comprehend that this effect is more likely to appear after discontinuation of intake. It happens because natural testosterone production is normally suppressed by administration of exogenous testosterone. But since there are such medications which can restore natural testosterone production, erectile dysfunctions can be prevented.
Sheryl Crow, a former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong, was also interviewed by feds. But questions are not known. According to certain suggestions, she might have been asked also about sexual abilities of the 7-time Tour de France winner.
In fact, federal prosecutors have a mistaken opinion in this case. Although shrunken testicles and erectile dysfunctions may occur because of steroids, these arguments are not reliable.

Many people are thankful for Don Hooton’s presentations about steroids

Some medications are named “performance-enhancing drugs”. What do these preparations represent? Why have been they called “performance-enhancing”? Various individuals may present different definitions. Let present what a teenager believes! Before presenting her point of view it is important to mention that her brother, Taylor Hooton, had serious depression after administration of steroids. Ultimately, he committed suicide. He desired to look like Melky Cabrera, Barry Bonds and other prominent sportspersons that have applied steroids. But his life ended suddenly. His sister believes that performance-enhancing drugs are dangerous products. They are called “performance-enhancing drugs” in order to lure young people that want to improve their appearances and performances.
Don Hooton, Taylor’s father, formed a foundation to teach youth about dangers related to steroids. He describes which dangers are associated with intake of anabolic steroids and other related medications. He also utilizes slideshow presentations in order to explain that these preparations can lead to such unwanted results, as diabetes, heart diseases, liver disorders, etc.
Don Hooton tries to educate young people about severe risks connected with intake of steroids. But he admits that it is not easy. He confirms that a lot of young individuals administer doping medications. When their friends see that they become stronger and more muscular, they want to look like them. They follow their examples in order to change appearance and have more endurance.
Unluckily, certain parents believe that their children are free from steroid use. Some of them think that their daughters don’t administer steroids because these medicines are recommended to get muscles and body weight in general. But according to certain sources, girls also take steroids. They take these medications in order to lose fat. Several parents don’t know that anabolic steroids are also applied to lower fat deposits. That’s why adults also should be taught about effects of steroids. Furthermore, certain parents think that their children don’t apply steroids because these medications are expensive. But it is enough to have 20-500 dollars in order to get steroids for a cycle.
It is affirmed that every16th high school student takes steroids. But this point of view is mistaken. Every 16th high school student admits to applying doping products.   But numerous young people hide that they use these medications.
Those that listen to Don Hooton’s explanations about steroids express their thanks. They are thankful that they may get knowledge about these medications.

Steroids are demonized in our fake world! Isn’t it hypocrisy?

Everybody knows that anabolic steroids are often demonized. If an athlete or a bodybuilder applies steroids and/or other performance-enhancing drugs, he/she is called a cheater. Sportswriters report about such sportspersons as about those who have destructed their reputation. Anti-doping officers put incredible efforts and spend money in other to determine whether certain athletes have doped. Even the government wastes taxpayers’ funds and time in order to prove that certain sportspersons have applied steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. It is confirmed that those that dope take unfair advantages during competitions.
Many articles describe the fight against steroids. But let think whether arguments against administration of steroids are strong enough to prove that it is disgraceful to use them.
It is confirmed that steroid-using sportspersons serve as a bad example for kids and young persons. It is known that youth sees numerous sports stars that use steroids and other related medications. As a result, young people want to look and be as strong, as these famous sports figures.  Furthermore, it is widely disputed about health dangers related to steroids. But if you are attentive, you can see that these arguments are weak because they are full of hypocrisy.
Let examine the most frequently used arguments against usage of anabolic steroids and/or other related medications.
According to the first argument, intake of steroids is closely associated with several potential health risks. Many articles warn about shrunken testicles and enlargement of heart that may occur on account of steroid use. However it may be true, let analyze our life. We consume unhealthy food, however we know that it destroys our health. Some individuals administer antidepressants that are also quite dangerous. We are also involved in other unhealthy activities.
According to another argument against steroids, steroid-using athletes have unfair advantages in competitions. They win because they increase performance with these medications. Let pay attention what happens in other areas, for example, in the world of entertainment.  A lot of actors and actresses improve their appearances and performances in order to play certain roles in movies. They also take unfair advantages over others with the help of some surgeries and other things. But they are not sentenced to suspensions.
While it is stated that steroid-using athletes send bad messages to young people who desire to look like them and follow their examples, no one notices about the bad example of actors and actresses. Young girls also want to look like those they see in magazines.
While federal agents pursue sportspeople that take steroids, they have nothing to do with actors and actresses who act the same way.
It is clear that arguments against application of steroids are very weak. They manifest hypocrisy that reigns in our counterfeit world.

It is strange that Nadzeya Ostapchuk has administered steroid metenolone

Nadzeya Ostapchuk, a Belarusian shot putter, won the 2012 Olympic gold medal. But the female athlete was stripped of the award because she failed a drug test. She was asked to provide two samples. The substance metenolone was found in both urine samples.
If you read news related to steroid use in sports, you must know that competitive sportspeople and bodybuilders are usually caught taking other steroids and/or doping products. But when it comes to Nadzeya Ostapchuk, she was caught taking metenolone. It is unusual, according to words of anti-doping officers. What does this banned medication represent? Why don’t athletes ordinarily administer this product for increase of performance?
Metenolone is an anabolic steroid. It possesses slight androgenic properties. It acts like testosterone, enhancing muscle mass and adding strength.
Although this medication has just weak androgenic nature, it leads to development of sex male characteristics in women. Women that use this preparation may face usual effects of virilization: the voice becomes deeper; excessive hair grows on the face and on other parts of the body; etc.
This drug may be used orally or injectionally.
Metenolone (Methenolone) produces amazing effects, when it is applied by athletes during their workouts. It is not applied during competitions. It doesn’t work, if it is used just on the day of a competition.
It is also affirmed that it is easy to detect those who take this steroid.
Unwanted reactions of Metenolone (Methenolone) depend on doses which are applied. They are following: water retention, hypercalcaemia, bone growth, hirsutism, acne, male-pattern baldness, troubles linked with menstrual cycles, enhanced libido, etc.
Thus, if you see a female athlete that has deep voice and hirsutism, you may accuse her of steroid use. In fact, it is wrong because these troubles may occur also in those women that don’t administer any steroids. But sometimes these effects demonstrate that certain women use medicines that possess androgenic properties.

Improper medical practice of Australian doctor led him to suspension

Several physician abuse their position, prescribing preparations which don’t correspond to clinical needs of patients. Why does it happen? It is known that several products are claimed to be prescription medications. It means that you can’t get them legally, if you don’t have any prescription from your treating physician. Anabolic steroids belong to such drugs. It is illegal to purchase steroids without a prescription in certain countries. Those who do it may be punished. They may be enforced to pay a fine and/or go to prison. Undoubtedly, a lot of persons are looking for ways to purchase and take these preparations without having legal troubles.
Anabolic steroids are widely abused. Many athletes and bodybuilders take these drugs not for therapeutic purposes but for performance-enhancing effects. If they live in countries where these medications can’t be obtained legally without prescriptions, they find some ways to mask their illicit purchase and administration. Sportspersons, bodybuilders and even ordinary people ask their physicians to prescribe them these products, as if they had therapeutic needs to apply them. Thus, several doctors induce selling anabolic steroids to those who abuse them. Here is a situation.
Peter Grant, an Australian health care provider, recommended steroids to 14 persons during 9 years. Medical state of these individuals didn’t require administration of these products. So, the health care provider was accused of improper practicing medicine. For example, he recommended to a patient taking such products, as Halotestin, Sustanon, Andriol Testocaps, Deca Durabolin, Scitropin and Proviron. But there was no any medical basis to prescribe these drugs to this person. Furthermore, these preparations were recommended him during nine years.
The physician Peter Grant acknowledged that some patients were competing. Thus, he prescribed them steroids. He also admitted to reading scientific literature about anabolic steroids. He confirmed that he knew how steroids worked. So, he supervised the patients who applied anabolic steroids.
Taking these aspects in consideration, it is possible to state that the physician Peter Grant was better known by those who took steroids for increase of performance than by those who had to be cured from several health troubles. Peter Grant confirmed that he knew that steroids were bought by his patients only for personal usage.
When the physician appeared in the court, the judge confirmed that the physician induced selling steroids. The judge added that Peter Grant had to be punished appropriately. Peter Grant was suspended from practicing medicine for 12 months. Furthermore, the judge confirmed that he would be disciplined during the next 2 years.

Musician Sheryl Craw had to be questioned as part of investigation linked with Lance Armstrong

The cyclist Lance Armstrong was accused of doping. It was suspected that the sportsperson had used EPO and other forbidden preparations.
Numerous individuals provided their testimonies in the court during the investigation related to Lance Armstrong’s case. A former girlfriend of the athlete was also targeted. She had to appear in the court. Certain sports journalists noticed that the musician Sheryl Crow had been interviewed by feds.
The athlete Lance Armstrong and the musician Sheryl Crow were claimed to be one of the most famous couples. They spent much time together. The musician lived with the seven-time winner of Tour de France in Spain. The musician travelled with the athlete during his workouts. They were engaged, when the cyclist won Tour de France the 7th time.
Lance Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton noted that Lance Armstrong had taken forbidden medicines. They also claimed that the athlete had been the leader of a doping group. Furthermore, Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton noticed that Armstrong’s apartment had been full of equipment used for application of forbidden medications. These persons were going to testify against Lance Armstrong. They noticed that the cyclist had won Tour de France 7 times because of banned medications.
As for Armstrong’s girlfriend Sheryl Crow, she didn’t appear in the court because the case against the cyclist was dropped prior to the hearing.
While the government dropped the case, the USADA continued to prosecute the former cyclist. As a result, Lance Armstrong forfeited his titles. He was also banned from sports for the whole life. Fortunately, his charity against cancer was not destroyed. Sponsors continue to support him and donate. Although his titles are stripped, Lance Armstrong is appreciated because he helps numerous people that fight against cancer.

Derek Jeter is suspected of doping

The ESPN2 journalist Skip Bayless accuses the baseball player Derek Jeter of steroid use. He has expressed his thoughts of criticism during the talk show “First take”.
In fact, the sports journalist doesn’t have any evidence in order to suppose that Derek Jeter applies doping medicines. Despites this fact, the statements of the ESPN2 journalist have been spread. Before accusing Derek Jeter of doping, Skip Bayless started to criticize anti-doping program of the MLB. He noticed that the MLB’s tests for prohibited medicines are not advanced enough to catch those who administer forbidden preparations.
The sports journalist Skip Bayless reminded Victor Conte’s opinion linked with testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test that is utilized in the MLB. This method is not sophisticated enough to detect those who take banned medicines. Instead of this method, it is needed to utilize another. Carbon isotope ratio is more sophisticated.
Skip Bayless also noted that the MLB didn’t have any testing for HGH. The test for this product is performed in the MLB just once per year. But blood tests for this drug should be performed more times throughout year. Otherwise, players may take this preparation and avoid detection.
So, the sports journalist Skip Bayless thinks that Derek Jeter administers HGH and banned preparations. The sports journalist also notes that if he were a baseball player, he would administer HGH.
Thus, Skip Bayless supposes that MLB players apply HGH and probably other forbidden medications without being detected by anti-doping officers.
It is quite evident that the steroid era in baseball has not ended. Professional baseball players apply different prohibited products and remain undetectable. But no one can accuse a sportsperson of steroid use, basing only on improper drug testing. It is necessary to focus on facts, accusing an athlete of intake of banned medicines. Under other circumstances, any suspicion doesn’t have any value.

Steroid scandal in MLB

It happens often that when sportspeople test positive for any forbidden substances, they try to prove that they have never taken any forbidden product intentionally. They are looking for various ways to display that they are innocent. They do a lot in order to prevent bans and/or other sanctions. Here is a case.
The baseball player Melky Cabrera tested positive for the anabolic steroid testosterone. Undoubtedly, he was sentenced to a ban. Like other sportspersons he decided to find a way to prove his innocence and avoid the suspension.
A lot of doping sportspeople that are caught confirm that they have taken a dietary supplement that caused positive for certain forbidden substance. However certain athletes may have administered contaminated dietary supplements, numerous sportspersons take steroids and choose this method of defense because it works in many situations.
So, Melky Cabrera confirmed that he had administered a dietary supplement which resulted in his positive for testosterone. In fact, it was a lie. Trying to prevent the 50-game suspension, he also created a web site and posted a fictitious product and advertisements which promoted selling it. The supplement didn’t exist in reality. It was just a lie of Melky Cabrera and his associates in order to defend the professional baseball player.
Juan Nunez, a paid consultant for Athletes’ Career Enhanced and Secured Incorporated (ACES), created the site.
But the hoax turned out to be unsuccessful. The MLB could expose the baseball player and Juan Nunez. Thus, Melky Cabrera was enforced to serve the suspension.
The ACES had also problems. Since Juan Nunez has been a consultant for ACES, the agency and Seth and Sam Levinson were suspected of involving in the lie. But these individuals affirmed that they were not implicated in the creation of the web site and the hoax that was thought out by Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. Juan Nunez also confirmed that Seth and Sam Levinson had not been implicated in this lie.
The Food and Drug Administration is still investigating the case. It is unclear yet whether other individuals would be also pursued and sanctioned for the lie.

Sydney Morning Herald newspaper: 4 persons were arrested while they tried to smuggle anabolic steroids for prostitutes

Recently Australian Customs and Border Protection detained four men who possessed the anabolic steroids Oxandrolone (Anavar) and Primoteston Depot (testosterone). Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle these drugs to Bangladesh. The drugs were confiscated and these persons were arrested.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a report about this case, affirming that four men were detained while they desired to traffic steroids that were intended for application by prostitutes in Bangladesh. This report surprised some people. What does The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper inform about? Do prostitutes use the same preparations like athletes and bodybuilder who try to improve their performance, increasing muscle size and stamina? Why do prostitutes administer anabolic steroids? Which is the purpose?
Several persons realized that it was wrong to write that Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle the steroids in order to inject prostitutes with them. Of course, prostitutes don’t take anabolic steroids. There is confusion here. Prostitutes administer corticosteroids which differ from anabolic steroids wholly. Corticosteroids produce other effects. They have capacity to enhance performance in prostitutes. While anabolic steroids add muscle size and reduce fat deposits, corticosteroids induce wasting muscles and enhance body fat deposits.
Orexadon is one of catabolic steroids taken by prostitutes. Those who use this drug look healthier and more attractive. So, such prostitutes that apply this remedy have more clients.
A prostitute that uses Orexadon notices that she has capacity to serve up to 15 clients a day.
So, it is possible to conclude that prostitutes don’t use anabolic steroids that are usually indicated for performance-enhancing effects in sports and bodybuilding. Corticosteroids are more appropriate products for them.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a false report. Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam didn’t smuggle steroids for prostitutes in Bangladesh.

Usage of Clomid and steroid cycles

When you purchase steroids for cycles, you should also get such remedies that must be applied to receive recovery after usage of steroids.
In case a steroid cycle lasts more than 8 weeks, HCG should be used during the cycle. It is important to take in consideration that this preparation is administered just during steroid use.
There such remedies which must be used after steroid cycles. For example, Clomid should be administered after steroid use. It is needed to start applying this product after androgen levels fall significantly and recovery with this product becomes possible. It is usually recommended to start applying Clomid with an increased quantity (300 mg/day) and decrease it gradually till 50 mg daily. Then low doses are used until steroid users are sure that natural production of testosterone is restored and testicles have returned to their normal size.
If Clomid is applied circa 6 weeks and no improvement is observed, it is needed to interrupt administration of this product. Then if improvements don’t occur, it is recommended to continue using Clomid till recovery is gotten. It is allowed to take this medication a year. Some studies have displayed that long-term administration of this drug doesn’t lead to severe problems. However some persons may experience vision problems because of Clomid, these troubles are not irreversible. They disappear after discontinuation of usage. If any troubles related to vision system occur in those that use Clomid, they must stop applying this medicine.
Clomid may be also used after steroid use. A normal measure is 75 mg a day in such situations.
However there are such remedies that help to get recovery after steroid use and maintain strength and muscle gains, it is not recommended to apply long-term steroid cycles.

Which anti-estrogen is safer and stronger: Clomid vs Nolvadex?

A lot of people frequently ask which medicine is more proper for a PCT: Clomid vs Nolvadex. While several consumers of steroids think that Clomid is better for this need, others think that Nolvadex is more proper. Several persons claim that Clomid and Nolvadex should be stacked.
When you evaluate structures of these medications, you can see that they have similar structures. That’s why they have some similar properties. But the most of people and even specialists affirm that Clomid and Nolvadex are entirely different medicines. Which basis does this opinion have? These medicines are used in medicine for different purposes. Nolvadex is recommended for treatment of breast cancer in females. As for Clomid, it is applied in case of infertility. That’s why it is affirmed that these are totally various medicines.
In fact, they may be also applied for different purposes in bodybuilding and sports. Clomid is recommended in order to receive recovery after a steroid cycle during a PCT. When it comes to Nolvadex, it is usually utilized as an anti-estrogen compound.
Comparing potency of these drugs, it is possible to see that Nolvadex is more potent anti-estrogen substance than Clomid.
Both Clomid and Nolvadex are capable to lower levels of estrogen, stimulating hypothalamus to produce greater quantities of testosterone.
When it comes to measures of these drugs, they are different because one of them is more potent than another. Clomid should be used in more increased doses. Thus, such dosages of Nolvadex, as 20-40 mg, produce more obvious benefits than 100-150 mg of Clomid.
Nolvadex is not the most powerful anti-estrogen. Such medicines, as Proviron, Arimidex and Viratase, are claimed to be more potent but Nolvadex and Clomid work faster.
Sometimes Clomid or Nolvadex may be applied together with Arimidex or Proviron during a steroid cycle. Such stacks are usually applied in case of gynecomastia.
When you try to choose which drug you should administer: Nolvadex or Clomid, you should take into account certain aspects.
Nolvadex has positive impact on cholesterol levels. It also has more direct influence on natural secretion of testosterone than Clomid. As it has been already mentioned, Nolvadex is more powerful than Clomid. In addition to these priorities, Nolvadex is safer. Furthermore, Nolvadex leads to less dangerous side consequences than Clomid because more reduced measures are required to produce needed effects. Moreover, while undesirable consequences of Clomid are irreversible, those of Nolvadex disappear after discontinuation of application. The only priority of Clomid is following: it helps to stoare more potential gains than Nolvadex.
Knowing these differences between Nolvadex and Clomid, consumers of steroids can make their choice correctly.